NRLW Round 4 Preview: Cherrington ban tough but fair as Eels face mammoth test against Broncos
All you need to know for Round 4 of the NRLW.
Join The Roar
Become a member to join in Australia's biggest sporting debate, submit articles, receive updates straight to your inbox and keep up with your favourite teams and authors.
Oops! You must provide an email address to create a Roar account
When using Facebook to create or log in to an account, you need to grant The Roar permission to see your email address
By joining The Roar you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions
Login and get Roaring
Oops! You must provide an email address to create a Roar account
When using Facebook to create or log in to an account, you need to grant The Roar permission to see your email address
Expert
Joined August 2013
812k
Views
664
Published
2.2k
Comments
Lawyer, sports advocate and proud owner and founder of the Ladies Who empire, including Ladies who League, Ladies who Legspin, Ladies who Lineout and Ladies who Leap. Send me love on twitter at @ladieswholeague! x
Published
Comments
All you need to know for Round 4 of the NRLW.
Round 3 of the NRLW is tossing up a few blockbuster clashes.
Round two of the NRLW is still not easy to pick a winner even though we've now got some form to go on.
The NRLW is supposed to be about to kick off its biggest season yet but attention is elsewhere.
The length of the season needs to be cut back and the Origin schedule should be dramatically changed.
It's hard to feel any connection with the current Blues team that's ever-changing.
Gold Coast have a united front office, now they just need Des Hasler to get the best out of their playing talent.
It's time to have a serious look about when Origin is played for both the men and women.
Poor old Mitchell Moses is on a hiding to nothing on Wednesday night, even if the Blues win.
Parramatta five-eighth Dylan Brown faces an uncertain future after being charged with serious offences.
Long-term thinking is needed to ensure Women's Origin continues to grow.
It's hard to fathom how St George Illawarra thought Jack de Belin was the player who should captain the club this week.
Paul Kent’s comments outside the courtroom really caught my attention.
Playing a double-header in Las Vegas is not the best way to grow rugby league internationally.
I’m going to say something that I know is going to tick off a lot of rugby union fans. Despite being an avid sports…
Anzac Day is a time to commemorate, not celebrate or commercialise.
Jarryd Hayne is not the victim, he does not deserve sympathy.
NRLW players are on the move at a record rate but it's all part of the rapid expansion of the competition.
Kick-off times at the footy are not fan friendly.
Concussion in contact sports is an issue that needs to be constantly monitored.
Dutski, what have you made of Gayle Broughton in the opening rounds?
Also agree re the Eels, absolutely underdogs, but we saw last week what can happen!
NRLW Round 3 Preview: Titans and Tigers chase hat-tricks but Eels and Broncos still searching for first win
Let’s see how I go Nick!
NRLW Round 2 Preview: We've kicked off but it's still hard to predict who's going to come out on top
Isn’t that exactly what has happened here? The player stood down still gets paid and is still able to train with the team. They just miss time on the field? No player has been prevented from pursuing their profession.
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
Brett it’s not the same comparison. The players represent the game at all times (unfortunately). There is very little, I would argue, that is unrelated to their work.
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
But Gray-Hand, where do you draw the line? Like which offences should you be stood down for and which not?
It’s a really tricky issue.
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
I suppose ‘The Raw’ at the very least he decided to go out when his playing group made a pact to try and lay low. At the very least, if I were his teammates I would want to understand and make sure it didn’t happen again.
‘Rehabilitation’ is potentially the wrong word. I have a legal background so when I think about why we ‘punish’ people, there’s a ‘punishment’ element but also an element of how we can help them too. 🙂
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
The situation with the NRL is different once again.
In a normal workplace, employees are not the face of the organisation. For the NRL, their brand and reputation is highly impacted by players and their behvaiour.
Let me use another example – if a player had been accused of murder, would they continue to play?
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
Dutski, I think for Brown, if it does end up being five counts, my understanding is that that is 5 years. The NRL stepped in and used their discretion in this instance.
Perhaps the 11 years has come from a review the NRL did of the offences they were most concerned about? There would be a reason why that threshold was selected.
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
Regardless of what the court decides – he was out and about when the team made a commitment not to be out and about. Alcohol was likely involved too. There is always opportunity for growth and change in these situations – just like if an employee made the decision to disgrace themselves at an office Christmas party.
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
Each situation and employer is different Ben.
What about a person who works with children, accused of a crime related to children? That’s an example where I am certain that person would be stood down.
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
Which paragraph are you referring to?
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
It’s not quite the case that there is ‘no evidence’. There is enough evidence for charges to be laid.
It’s also not just about ‘guild’ or ‘innocence’.
When it came to JDB, I remember writing an article a few years ago about how I thought the stand down would help him. It meant he was still being paid and training with his friends, whilst focusing on the important thing (i.e. the charges that had been laid against him).
Regardless of the outcome of the case too, the NRL has a brand to uphold and each of these players has brought the game into disrepute.
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
It is a ‘no fault’ stand down policy. It has nothing to do with guilt.
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
It’s a ‘no fault stand down’ – there is no presumption of guilt there.
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
The challenge, Dionysus is that currently the Policy gives the NRL discretion. So even if an offence does not meet the criteria set out, the NRL can use its discretion and stand that player down. So really, the NFSP can apply in any situation the NRL deems appropriate.
Why NRL should revisit no fault stand-down policy in the wake of Brown allegations
I assume the coach, Farmyard Friend.
Jack Bird and Zac Lomax are also part of the leadership group and were not selected.
Making de Belin captain of Dragons a sad indictment on a club that doesn't know what true leadership looks like
How is he being cancelled? Not every player has the opportunity to captain a team throughout their career.
Making de Belin captain of Dragons a sad indictment on a club that doesn't know what true leadership looks like
Participating? Or leading? There is a difference there.
Making de Belin captain of Dragons a sad indictment on a club that doesn't know what true leadership looks like
And has done so with AFL too!
Rugby living rent free in NRL's head but childish chairmen of both codes raise questions on governance issues
The article isn’t really about that at all. The article is about the behaviour of both V’landys and McLennan. McLennan makes a comment and V’landys hits back.
I would really be curious, if you exclude those two where you see it coming from. Is it the media or just generally speaking amongst fans?
Rugby living rent free in NRL's head but childish chairmen of both codes raise questions on governance issues
But it’s not just the AFL, jameswm – keep an eye on the newspapers and the way most corporations conduct themselves. It is the CEO who comments because they know about the day to day running of the business. It’s not the board who is in the press all the time.
Rugby living rent free in NRL's head but childish chairmen of both codes raise questions on governance issues
Stevo, I am genuinely interested here (because I think any code bagging another is stupid). Where have you seen the bagging from rugby league to union?
Rugby living rent free in NRL's head but childish chairmen of both codes raise questions on governance issues
Mick, I would absolutely love to see an investment made in that space too! So much opportunity to ensure that Indigenous people have pathways to play the sports that they love at the highest level.
Rugby living rent free in NRL's head but childish chairmen of both codes raise questions on governance issues
Andrew, seriously! Agree with you – just shut up.
Rugby living rent free in NRL's head but childish chairmen of both codes raise questions on governance issues
Hi Caractacus – so glad you are enjoying the NRLW and great to see so much English talent included. My view is that the competition probably won’t expand again until 2025, just to give the 4 new teams intro-ed this year some time to settle. So perhaps then!
NRLW Round 3 Preview: Titans and Tigers chase hat-tricks but Eels and Broncos still searching for first win